“CRISIS IN
THE VENEZUELAN MALLS INDUSTRY”
By
Mario Castro F., CRX, CSM, CMD, CLS, CDP
February 6th, 2014
Caracas. On November 29, 2013, the socialistic
Venezuelan government dictate the Emergency Decree 602 with the intention of
regulating the Shopping Centers industry and looking to lowering Merchants
Occupancy Costs so these will lower the price of their products and services to
the population.
Decree 602 focused on four main pillars of the
industry endangering its very existence, as we know it in Venezuela, since the
last fifteen years. The regulations of Decree 602 established in its essential
part:
a) A maximum fixed lease rent at Bs.250
/m2/month (USD$22/m2/month at the official rate or USD$2,94 at the free market
rate)b) Ban percentage of sales as a variable lease rent freely subscribed between Malls and retailers
c) Maximum common expenses as 25% of the maximum fixed lease rent
d) Ban of fines payment for breaches of rules and regulations
Clearly, observing Decree 602 makes shopping centers industry
unsustainable, as we know it for the last fifteen years, because:
a) Destroy and precludes the formation of national capital,
which has allowed huge investments in the fifteen years of development of this
industry with significant public housing complexes built in the major cities of
Venezuela.
b) Puts a straitjacket on the essence of the business
partnership between merchants and owners of the centers, who share the risks
with the sales volumes they can achieve based on the services provided to the
community.
c) It precludes the daily operation of shopping
centers to set common expenses well below those necessary to maintain the level
and quality of service, as we know it for fifteen years.
d) Create anarchy in daily business operations by
prohibiting the application of fines for breaches of rules and regulations that
are the basis of security and quality of services provided by Malls to their
communities.
The effects of Decree 602 are already being seeing and
in the coming days will be increasingly notorious for these reasons. Moreover,
we do not refer to the very issue of retail, now with controlled prices and
enormous difficulties to replenish inventories in the current legal context. It
is an aggravating of the situation of Shopping Centers beginning to look their
professional associates retailers base, who have they have built with so much effort,
it is been diluted and disappears.Compounding the situation furthermore, on January 23, 2014, the Venezuelan socialistic government, protected by the Enabling Act granted powers to legislate on economic matters to the President, issued Organic and Fair Prices Act (LOPJ). The Act sets out regulations for the prices of ALL goods and services and include penalties, fines, closures, interventions, expropriation, confiscation, imprisonment, and disqualification for directors, executives and employees of companies that violate its provisions.
The LOPJ creates enormous legal uncertainty alone, in
addition to the violation of clear provisions of the Constitution, to make it a
clearly unconstitutional and legally unsafely instrument that will be subject
to the protest of citizenship. The LOPJ states: "Section 7. Declare and
therefore are of public utility and social interest, ALL goods and services
required for the activities of production, manufacture, import, storage,
transport, distribution and marketing of goods and services .“, making this expropriated
and forfeitable at government will.” Any official of government is responsible
for the implementation of the Law.
The spirit of the implementation of the LOPJ has
already been demonstrated when the rector, Mrs. Tarazón, of the body set up to
coordinate implementation of the law, SUNDDE for short, insulted, offended and
assaulted the maximum business executives body of the country, FEDECÁMARAS, when
these apply for protection before the
Supreme Court, comparing them with war criminals.
There seems to be no spirit of understanding, dialogue
or negotiation by the regime to reach a balance that allows private enterprise
to carry out activities for the benefit of the population, with the return on
investment logic for taking risk and compensation of the amount invested.
Either way, is compromised the sustainability of the Malls
industry in Venezuela, in addition to the existence of private enterprise and constitutional
individuals freedom rights.